<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Robert Schusters Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org</link>
	<description>My webblog at evolvis.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:20:23 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Shark bites ARM by gbenson</title>
		<link>http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2009/03/27/shark-bites-arm/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>gbenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2009/03/27/shark-bites-arm/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Nice work!  One little thing though:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;The line above “Hello World!” indicates that Shark has compiled a method and run it. Nice!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not exactly... &lt;code&gt;PrintCompilation&lt;/code&gt; prints when it &lt;em&gt;starts&lt;/em&gt; compiling the method, so for Hello World the VM exited before the compilation completed.  You need to use &lt;code&gt;SharkTraceInstalls&lt;/code&gt; if you want to see when the compiled methods are inserted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work!  One little thing though:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The line above “Hello World!” indicates that Shark has compiled a method and run it. Nice!</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Not exactly&#8230; <code>PrintCompilation</code> prints when it <em>starts</em> compiling the method, so for Hello World the VM exited before the compilation completed.  You need to use <code>SharkTraceInstalls</code> if you want to see when the compiled methods are inserted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shark bites ARM by Ken Gilmer</title>
		<link>http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2009/03/27/shark-bites-arm/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gilmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2009/03/27/shark-bites-arm/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Great work Robert and Xerces!  It was great to meet you both in person at FOSDEM, and am looking forward to more news on LLVM+OpenJDK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work Robert and Xerces!  It was great to meet you both in person at FOSDEM, and am looking forward to more news on LLVM+OpenJDK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fedora giving FOSS graphics driver &#8220;nouveau&#8221; a try by rschuster</title>
		<link>http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2009/03/27/fedora-giving-foss-graphics-driver-nouveau-a-try/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>rschuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2009/03/27/fedora-giving-foss-graphics-driver-nouveau-a-try/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Sure I can use the Beagleboard&#039;s graphics with touching the SGX (X11 via framebuffer).

I am not so concerned about the technical things. What bothers me is that although the FOSS community makes many advancements in regard to free drivers there are still some companies that insist on delivering only their non-free proprietary stuff to us.

I simply want that people know this when they talk about how cool the upcoming generation of devices is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure I can use the Beagleboard&#8217;s graphics with touching the SGX (X11 via framebuffer).</p>
<p>I am not so concerned about the technical things. What bothers me is that although the FOSS community makes many advancements in regard to free drivers there are still some companies that insist on delivering only their non-free proprietary stuff to us.</p>
<p>I simply want that people know this when they talk about how cool the upcoming generation of devices is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fedora giving FOSS graphics driver &#8220;nouveau&#8221; a try by GNUtoo</title>
		<link>http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2009/03/27/fedora-giving-foss-graphics-driver-nouveau-a-try/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>GNUtoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2009/03/27/fedora-giving-foss-graphics-driver-nouveau-a-try/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>hi,
Did you know that there was a plan about reverse engeenering the SGX? 
http://forum.openpandora.org/viewtopic.php?f=14&amp;t=341

I was also told that you can use the Pandora(and maybe the beagle board as they are very similar) without the 3d.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,<br />
Did you know that there was a plan about reverse engeenering the SGX?<br />
<a href="http://forum.openpandora.org/viewtopic.php?f=14&amp;t=341" rel="nofollow">http://forum.openpandora.org/viewtopic.php?f=14&amp;t=341</a></p>
<p>I was also told that you can use the Pandora(and maybe the beagle board as they are very similar) without the 3d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serving cross-compiled OpenJDK with IcedTea by Robert Schusters Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shark bites ARM</title>
		<link>http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2008/12/21/serving-cross-compiled-openjdk-with-icedtea/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Schusters Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shark bites ARM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2008/12/21/serving-cross-compiled-openjdk-with-icedtea/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] running on the Bugs. Since BugLabs uses a variant of OpenEmbedded named Poky this meant getting OpenJDK cross-compiled. This alone was an interesting and complicated thing but was eventually finished and I did a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] running on the Bugs. Since BugLabs uses a variant of OpenEmbedded named Poky this meant getting OpenJDK cross-compiled. This alone was an interesting and complicated thing but was eventually finished and I did a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serving cross-compiled OpenJDK with IcedTea by pfeffer</title>
		<link>http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2008/12/21/serving-cross-compiled-openjdk-with-icedtea/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>pfeffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2008/12/21/serving-cross-compiled-openjdk-with-icedtea/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>What do you think: It is possible to cross-compile for Windows Mobile?

I&#039;m a developer of cachewolf, a universalv tool for geocaching. We are now using Ewe( http://www.ewesoft.com/ ) in order to have Cachewolf running on all available platforms (Windows Desktop, Windows Mobile, Linux, mirBSD). We always have strong performance issues and would be very happy to have a VM that uses JIT.

Pfeffer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think: It is possible to cross-compile for Windows Mobile?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a developer of cachewolf, a universalv tool for geocaching. We are now using Ewe( <a href="http://www.ewesoft.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ewesoft.com/</a> ) in order to have Cachewolf running on all available platforms (Windows Desktop, Windows Mobile, Linux, mirBSD). We always have strong performance issues and would be very happy to have a VM that uses JIT.</p>
<p>Pfeffer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serving cross-compiled OpenJDK with IcedTea by Jim Pick</title>
		<link>http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2008/12/21/serving-cross-compiled-openjdk-with-icedtea/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Pick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2008/12/21/serving-cross-compiled-openjdk-with-icedtea/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Excellent work!  I can&#039;t wait to try this out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent work!  I can&#8217;t wait to try this out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serving cross-compiled OpenJDK with IcedTea by Peter</title>
		<link>http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2008/12/21/serving-cross-compiled-openjdk-with-icedtea/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2008/12/21/serving-cross-compiled-openjdk-with-icedtea/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Great news.
Is there any chance of seeing a JavaSE for a Windows CE (PDA) platform?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news.<br />
Is there any chance of seeing a JavaSE for a Windows CE (PDA) platform?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jalimo progress &#8211; piecing together the gems by Robert Schusters Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comments on latest post on OpenJDK</title>
		<link>http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2007/11/28/jalimo-progress-piecing-together-the-gems/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Schusters Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comments on latest post on OpenJDK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.fsfe.org://393ca25c214271b61df0e7eec7a2c45f#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] Java runtime. What I left out in my explanation is that all of this builds on top of my previous work on a completely self-hosting Java^H^H^H^HJava-like toolchain based on GNU Classpath, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Java runtime. What I left out in my explanation is that all of this builds on top of my previous work on a completely self-hosting Java^H^H^H^HJava-like toolchain based on GNU Classpath, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serving cross-compiled OpenJDK with IcedTea by Wladimir Mutel</title>
		<link>http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2008/12/21/serving-cross-compiled-openjdk-with-icedtea/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Wladimir Mutel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rschuster.blogs.evolvis.org/2008/12/21/serving-cross-compiled-openjdk-with-icedtea/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Why not use Scratchbox(.org) for your cross-compilation ? It presents you native ARM environment (with all native binaries, libs, uname printouts, etc.), while relaying heavy compilations to the cross-compiler on your powerful x86 host. Should probably save you from a lot of your tweaks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not use Scratchbox(.org) for your cross-compilation ? It presents you native ARM environment (with all native binaries, libs, uname printouts, etc.), while relaying heavy compilations to the cross-compiler on your powerful x86 host. Should probably save you from a lot of your tweaks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
